Instead, the court should keep it simple, treat the Trump immunity decision as the easy “non-official” electioneering case ...

During Bill Clinton’s administration, conservatives universally scorned the notion that he should get a break.

Opinion: A lower court ruling was too casual in dismissing presidential immunity, an Iowa law professor explains before Trump ...

But several justices and outside experts said Sauer’s arguments, taken together, laid out a diminished version of impeachment ...

Justices on the Supreme Court voiced skepticism Thursday to assertions from former President Trump’s attorneys that ...

Prosecutors believe Donald J. Trump’s official acts in trying to overturn the election should be admissible evidence even if ...

This immunity is broader than its congressional counterpart. A president is exempt from congressional enactments only to the extent that he has inherent preclusive power. In Hohfeldian terms ...

In the Trump "immunity" case, why were conservative Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh discussing consequences rather ...

The historic arguments about the presumptive GOP nominee for president is the final case the Supreme Court is considering ...

The Supreme Court heard nearly three hours of arguments Thursday in the blockbuster case over whether former President Donald ...

Republican presidential candidate's legal team will argue he is exempt from federal prosecution for alleged criminal actions ...

During Thursday's arguments, Kavanaugh, who was appointed in 2018, asked Trump's attorney whether or not the "source" of ...