Post Office victim calls for lawyer to be removed from Horizon redress scheme
A Post Office scandal victim has called for a top lawyer to be removed from administering Horizon redress schemes. Former sub-postmaster Lee Castleton said Rodric Williams was "conflicted". Mr Williams was a litigation lawyer at the Post Office while it was prosecuting sub-postmasters.
More than 900 sub-postmasters were wrongly prosecuted for stealing because of incorrect information from a computer system called Horizon. The Post Office itself took many cases to court ...
The role of the Post Office's former in-house lawyers is being closely scrutinised at the ongoing Horizon inquiry.
A former Post Office lawyer has said he does not “recall seeing” a report on bugs in the Horizon IT system which was emailed ...
The Post Office scandal began with the procurement of Horizon software in the 1990s, after John Major’s government agreed to the public finance initiative (PFI) deal with ICL, later acquired by ...
How much did the people running the Post Office get paid while the flawed Horizon system was in place? By looking through the company accounts for the Post Office and Royal Mail, the BBC has ...
The Post Office’s lead lawyer considered halting prosecutions of sub-postmasters two years before the cases were eventually ...
David Miller, who retired in 2006 as chief operating officer of the Post Office, had been told of problems with Horizon when he held meetings with post office operators in June 1999, the ...
Beginning her evidence at the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry in central London on Thursday, said she understood apologising “doesn’t change what’s happened”. She told the Post Office ...
Hundreds were wrongly prosecuted after faulty software said money was missing from Post Office branch accounts. More than 900 sub-postmasters were wrongly prosecuted for stealing because of ...
Fujitsu engineer Gareth Jenkins' statement to court in 2010 about the faulty Horizon IT system contradicted a report he had ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback