“CIA assesses with low confidence that a research-related origin of the COVID-19 pandemic is more likely than a natural origin based on the available body of reporting,” a CIA spokesperson ...

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA ... determine the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic, as reported by the NYT. According to unnamed officials cited by the newspaper, this shift in perspective ...

Zeynep Tufecki, a Times columnist and sociology professor at Princeton University, wrote in a recent opinion piece that the ...

A column published in The New York Times claimed the public was "badly misled" about the origins of COVID, even after its own ...

The CIA "continues to assess that both research-related and natural origin scenarios of the COVID-19 pandemic remain plausible,” the agency wrote in a statement about its new assessment.

More and more evidence points to the Wuhan lab as the origin of COVID-19, but answers are elusive, and a look at the issue without the filter of politics is rarer yet. The new Trump Administration has ...

The New York Times published a piece acknowledging that the lab leak theory was likely correct. Five years too late.

This January, the CIA changed its official assessment of COVID. It now believes a research-related accident is the most likely origin ... I am making a career shift. I’ve decided to move ...

"CIA continues to assess that both research-related and natural origin scenarios of the Covid-19 pandemic remain plausible," the spokesperson noted. A US official told AFP the shift was based on a ...

For years, the CIA has said it is unclear whether COVID-19 was the result of a lab incident or a natural origin. Its latest assessment points the finger at China even while acknowledging it has ...

The New York Times published an opinion column claiming the scientific community "badly misled" the public in an effort to suppress the theory that COVID-19 originated in a lab in Wuhan, China ...