News

Arizona State began distributing revenue-sharing funds to athletes on July 10, in response to the recent House v. NCAA ...
The recent NCAA settlement enables direct athlete payments from schools and raises concerns about non-revenue sports and ...
A federal judge on Friday awarded $515 million in fees to the attorneys representing athlete plaintiffs in the $2.8 billion ...
The landmark agreement will result in a new financial model that allows schools to directly share revenue with college ...
Sarah K. Rathke is a trial attorney in Cleveland and the co-head of Squire Patton Boggs’ U.S. sports and entertainment ...
The National Collegiate Athletic Association is facing a growing number of new court challenges after a U.S. judge in ...
The NCAA is grappling with new appeals to its nearly $2.8 billion antitrust settlement that threaten to topple the deal finalized last month with thousands of student athletes.
The former Eagles starter is a part of the sixth appeal in the House v. NCAA settlement that was approved in June.
In this article, Heights' sports editor Maria Stefanoudakis breaks down the implications of the House vs. NCAA decision on BC ...
The recent settlement of In re College Athlete NIL Litigation (the Settlement) has been challenged on Title IX grounds. The ...
College athletics is in uncharted territory after the House settlement was approved in June. Experts expect growing pains in ...
The House Settlement directly resolved outstanding antitrust lawsuits arising out the NCAA’s compensation system for the use ...