From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or ...

As expected, Wednesday’s argument in Jack Daniel’s Properties v VIP Products showcased the justices grappling with line-drawing. At issue in the case was how First Amendment trademark principles ...

The Supreme Court heard arguments in a trademark dispute between Jack Daniel’s and a dog accessory company that creates parody chew toys mimicking the whiskey distiller’s iconic bottle and label.

The United States Supreme Court has sided with Jack Daniel’s over a trademark dispute with a dog accessory company, which parodied the iconic whiskey brand. On Thursday (8 June), the Supreme ...

A trademark ... Jack Daniel's likes its customers even more and doesn't want them to be confused or associating its fine whiskey with dog poop." If it can prove that confusion, it likely will win ...

Though the court’s decision is a win for Jack Daniel’s – which argued that an appeals ... about First Amendment protections in trademark disputes, it provided a respite from some of the ...

The U.S. Supreme Court has sided with Jack Daniel's in a unanimous decision over a trademark dispute between the Tennessee whiskey brand and VIP Products, the country's second-largest dog toy ...

The United States Supreme Court has sided with Jack Daniel’s over a trademark dispute with a dog accessory company, which parodied the iconic whiskey brand. On Thursday (8 June), the Supreme Court ...

Jack Daniel’s Properties sued the dog toy producer, claiming it was infringing on its trademark and diluting its reputation by associating it with dog poop. The trial court ruled in the whiskey ...